fbpx
Q&A with Mark Regnerus

Q&A with Mark Regnerus

Q&A

Mark Regnerus is an associate pro- fessor of sociology at the University of Texas at Austin and a faculty as- sociate at the university’s Population Research Center. His research is in the areas of sexual behavior, family and religion. Mark is the author of two books: Premarital Sex in America: How Young Americans Meet, Mate, and Think about Marrying, which describes the norms, behav- iors and mating market realities facing young adults, and Forbidden Fruit: Sex and Religion in the Lives of American Teenagers, which tells the story of how religion does—and does not—shape teenagers’ sexual decision-making. His work has been widely reviewed and his research and opinion pieces have been featured in numerous media outlets. Most recently, he was the author of a 2012 study appearing in Social Science Research on the comparatively optimal outcomes of young adults from stably married families.

Q: Some of your work focuses on “sexual economics,” the social and relational impact of the cheapening of sex. How do you see porn fitting into that sociological framework? 01

Pornography and masturbation are nothing if not the “cheapest” forms of sex. But modern pornography is distinctive in that it not only supplies cheap sex but stimulates interest in it, too. That is not how supply-and-demand curves typically work. Instead, porn creates—then meets—demand with a near-infinite supply, kept afloat by its propensity toward compulsion. Even the market in prostitution does not function like that.

The second half of the 20th century birthed three forms of technology that function to drive down the “price” of sex. Fertility control and online pornography each, in their own way, seek to “free” sexual relationships—the Pill from unwanted pregnancies, and porn from the demands of self-control and the challenges that come from navigating relationships and the real-time wishes of real people. Throw in online dating- and meeting software, which makes the process of accessing cheap sex more efficient, and you have the ingredients that have combined to bring us to this place.

The hook-up culture isn’t just “out there” anymore. It’s inside the Church: masked, moderated (a bit) and justified, prompting congregations everywhere to do soul searching over whether they’re genuinely utilizing technology to better evangelize the world or, instead, to conform to it.

Q: Your book Premarital Sex in America examines the sex lives of young adults in the U.S. In your view, what role does porn play in young adults’ sexual, social and relational decision-making? 02

It is difficult for those of us who grew up before the Internet to truly identify with how sexual education and assumptions about relationships have changed because the Internet exists. Women are entirely correct when they perceive that pornography creates competition. There may have been an era in which a man dabbling with porn would have had trouble retaining the sexual interest of a woman, but that era is no more. Women now consider it the new cost of doing business with men. To be sure, breaking off a relationship because of pornography use can be a rational and moral reaction—but few recognize that doing so also contributes to the broader retreat from marriage and significant relationships about which many of us claim to be concerned. Hence for both good and bad reasons, the flight from marriage in the Church continues unabated. This is the pornographic “double bind,” wherein women find themselves stuck between unhappy scenarios—the unwanted porn use of the man they are with, the elevated odds of the same among the man they might leave him for, and the risk of being alone. On the matter of men and pornography, the data suggest you may not be able to flee far enough.

Continue Reading
Back to the Study

The Uses of Porn

Read Section
02